FILE PL-IP-2026-0219 CONFIDENTIAL ISSUED 2 AUGUST 2026 BASIS PUBLISHED PATENT RECORD PREPARED FOR OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
IP portfolio audit
You can save $842K in a year. $2.31M over 5 years.
We went through all 1,636 patents EFI has filed, and the 470 still live today. You grant faster than the whole European field, and your most cited invention appears in 1,743 later patents.
Almost everything this portfolio loses, it loses after the patent is already won. 109 of the patents you renew are no longer earning their fees, and the open ground under your presses is worth more again.
What we looked at
1,636
Patents examined
591
Trademarks examined
6
Companies benchmarked
15
Technology fields mapped
Contents
01
Your portfolio
1,636 filed. 470 still alive.
1,166 patents are gone out of the 1,636 ever filed. 811 simply reached the end of their 20 year life, which is normal. The other 309 were dropped early without paying renewal fees.
Every patent, by status
Status
Share of all 1,636 patents, largest first015%30%45%60%
Patents
Share
Inactive, expired at end of term
811
49.6%
Active, granted
361
22.1%
Inactive, fees not paid
156
9.5%
Inactive, withdrawn or surrendered
153
9.4%
Active, applied
109
6.7%
Inactive, status not stated in the extract
46
2.8%
Patents filed and granted, 2017 to 2025
015304560
Year
201720182019202020212022202320242025
Filed
58931282926433737
Granted
242044303739273039
Applications filedPatents granted
A patent stays alive only while a yearly fee is paid, which is what a renewal date is.
02
Strengths
4 things are working well.
You are good at getting patents. Grants come faster than the European field, the field builds on EFI inventions, and almost nobody has challenged what you hold. Everything after this is about keeping what the engine builds.
Strength, strongest first
Score, 10 is best
Foundational influence
1,743 citations on your top patent
Your most cited patent, and a family of virtual printer inventions cited hundreds of times each. These are the reference points rivals keep returning to.
8
Fast to grant
31 months to a US grant
Ahead of Durst at 43, AGFA at 39 and Bobst at 38, and within reach of Epson at 29. Protection starts while the European field is still in line.
7
Filing Focus
1,636 patents, all in print
The front end, inkjet engines, inks and industrial print.
7
Global Filings
439 US, 278 EP, 273 PCT
Filed where the customers are, plus Australia, Germany, China and Japan. The book is global rather than domestic, which matters for a company shipping machines worldwide.
6
03
Opportunities
6 places value is waiting.
The largest sits under your own machines. Nozomi, Reggiani and Cretaprint sell into fields where EFI holds 14, 42 and 100 patents. You already own the engineering, and only the filings are missing.
Where value waits
Score, 10 is best
Few Patents on Packaging are unprotected
8,136 to 18,959 patents per field
Nozomi, Reggiani and Cretaprint ship into packaging, textile and ceramic, where EFI holds 14, 42 and 100. A freedom to operate screen before new tooling beats a redesign after it.
5
The dead 1,166
71% of the book inactive
811 expired, 156 dropped for unpaid fees, 153 withdrawn, and no note explains which were chosen. Sorting them shows what is still in window to revive.
4
The crown jewels
2 dead families to revive
The most cited patent and the virtual printer family behind distributed printing. Refilings and continuations on what is still in window put claims back on that ground.
4
The brand register
13 names to take back
3 quarters of the trademark register is gone, the same silent way. Section 09 sets out the revivals, the 2 unfiled flagships and the filing order.
4
Scattered Ownership
54 names on the register
A systematic misspelling of the house name, and separate entries for BEST, Reggiani, Jetrion, TR Systems and Matan. Recordals are a clerical fix, not a loss of rights.
5
The pipeline
37 new filings in 2024
Filings run in the 30s while expiries mount every year. Grants have kept pace for years, so what has slowed is the supply of new ideas.
5
04
Competitive landscape
A focused specialist among imaging giants.
FujiFilm holds 351,038 patents and Epson 265,964, but those books span cameras, sensors and consumer electronics. Inside the 10 classes that define digital printing, you out-file Durst and Bobst in all 10 and grant faster than the European 3. The exposure is Japan and China, the 2 fortress markets.
How big each book is
Company
Patent records0 to 351,038, largest first
The book spans
FujiFilm
351,038
Broad imaging conglomerate
Epson
265,964
Broad imaging conglomerate
AGFA
48,162
Imaging and print
Bobst
6,579
Packaging and converting
EFI
1,636
Digital print, the whole book
Durst
877
Industrial inkjet
Rival totals cover each company’s whole business, so this table sizes the neighbourhood. The class table below compares like with like.
The 10 classes that define digital printing
Class
What it covers, in plain words
EFIrecords
Durst
AGFA
Bobst
FujiFilm
Epson
G06F3/12
Sending digital output to a print unit
208
8
100
3
9,717
9,316
H04N1/60
Colour correction and control
186
0
222
0
3,864
2,698
B41J11/00
Handling sheet or web media
145
65
323
65
729
3,758
B41J2/01
Ink jet
112
33
496
15
9,478
21,516
B41J2/21
Multi colour printing
100
15
198
34
771
3,282
G06K15/02
Printing using printers
79
7
62
5
542
859
B41J29/38
Drives, motors and controls
76
7
44
1
6,237
8,221
H04N1/46
Colour picture communication
66
1
128
0
3,433
2,006
G06F3/043
Input using acoustic waves
65
0
0
0
13
56
H04N1/40
Picture signal circuits
57
0
195
2
2,779
1,075
Office by office, inside the 10 printing classes
Office
Share of the 6 companies shown, sorted by EFI’s count025%50%75%100%
EFI
FujiFilm
Epson
AGFA
Bobst
Durst
Total of the 6
US
232
4,472
8,547
346
23
19
13,639
EPO
155
1,363
1,863
345
24
19
3,769
WIPO
142
785
487
145
12
16
1,587
Australia
85
111
35
27
0
5
263
Spain
36
4
52
43
14
13
162
Japan
34
20,848
26,416
277
7
8
47,590
China
28
1,534
4,149
71
15
6
5,803
Germany
28
421
662
196
0
10
1,317
Brazil
23
1
63
24
0
6
117
Canada
17
45
46
25
0
3
136
Israel
17
1
0
2
2
1
23
New Zealand
11
0
15
0
0
0
26
Austria
9
93
248
10
0
11
371
UK
6
49
44
21
0
0
120
EFIFujiFilmEpsonAGFABobstDurst
Epson and FujiFilm overlap the inkjet and workflow ground, so if any names deserve a standing watch, it is those 2.
Months to a US grant
Firm
Shorter is better, fastest first012243648
Months
Photon Legal
about 11
Epson
29
FujiFilm
30
EFI
31
Bobst
38
AGFA
39
Durst
43
05
Prosecution
406 office actions. 94 requests for continued examination.
A request for continued examination, an RCE, is a paid restart. The office closes a case, and the file is bought back open so the same examiner can look at the same invention once more. We read the examination record of all 254 US applications the file wrapper covers. They carry 406 office actions, 94 RCEs and 181 paid extensions. That is $1.67M of prosecution work, and $507K of it went into applications that produced nothing you still hold today.
$1.67M
The prosecution meter, modelled at flat rates
$507K
Spent on files that are gone, 30% of the meter
94
RCEs across 60 applications
18 months
Added to the wait by 1 RCE, median
What the prosecution cost
Office action responses
406 rejections answered, 290 of them first time and 116 after the office had closed the case once.
$1,421,000406 at $3,500
Requests for continued examination
94 RCEs across 60 applications. Ten applications carry 30 of them between them. One file was restarted 6 times.
$141,00094 at $1,500
Paid extensions
181 extensions of time across 112 applications, bought when a reply deadline arrived before the reply did.
$107,000181 at $590
The prosecution meter, across 254 applications
$1.67M
16 applications died because of no response.
Application
What it covered
Office actions
RCEs
Modelled cost
How it ended
14/490,559
LED curable inkjet inks with UV absorbers
12
6
$57,490
Abandoned after failure to respond. No revival petition on file. No patent.
14/548,259
Multi-layered textured printing
10
4
$45,130
Granted as 11,007,791, after 2,372 days.
11/327,070
Merging scan files into a colour workflow
11
3
$44,180
Granted after 2,266 days, then expired for unpaid renewal fees.
These 3 files carry $146,800 between them. 1 produced no patent, and 1 more granted and then expired for unpaid renewal fees.
06
Patent landscape
The field is 135,000 patents. You hold 1,500 of them.
You hold the most patents in the area where most of them have already died, and the fewest where the market is biggest. Industrial printing holds 38,162 records against your 156, and it is where the presses ship. That is the open ground, and the calls below say which parts to take.
Where the book is alive, by technology area
Area
Share of EFI’s records in that area, live against dead050%100%
Live
EFI total
The field
Digital Imaging and Print WorkflowThe Fiery ground: colour, raster, job management. Deepest position, and the most dead.
50
610
24,233
Substrate Handling and Quality ControlMedia handling, curing, calibration, inspection. Half the records still live.
187
379
31,572
Ink and Coating MaterialsFormulations and coatings, the chemistry under every press.
119
239
23,899
Industrial Printing ApplicationsPackaging, textile, surface decoration. The largest field, the thinnest holding.
96
156
38,162
Inkjet Print Engine and Fluid DeliveryDrop control and printhead maintenance. The healthiest area in the book.
78
116
17,071
Granted or pendingInactive
A record can sit in more than 1 sub domain, so the 15 fields below count to 1,663. The 5 areas cover 1,500 of the 1,636 filed.
What to do in each of the 15 technology fields
Sub domain
Area
Fieldrecords since 2015
EFI
Our call
Color Management
Digital Imaging
7,047
190
Expand
Raster Processing
Digital Imaging
9,205
246
Keep filing
Job Management
Digital Imaging
3,271
190
Keep filing
Production Workflow
Digital Imaging
7,519
90
Grow selectively
Drop Control
Inkjet Print Engine
8,166
70
Hold and defend
Printhead Maintenance
Inkjet Print Engine
9,874
47
Hold and defend
Media Handling
Substrate Handling
5,898
81
Grow selectively
Drying and Curing
Substrate Handling
7,009
168
Keep filing
Calibration and Registration
Substrate Handling
1,355
73
Keep filing
Inspection and Compensation
Substrate Handling
8,420
78
Grow selectively
Ink Formulations
Ink and Coating
17,994
146
Hold and defend
Materials and Coatings
Ink and Coating
6,984
128
Grow selectively
Packaging Printing
Industrial Printing
8,136
14
File first
Textile Printing
Industrial Printing
12,536
42
File first
Surface Decoration
Industrial Printing
18,959
100
Expand
File first means near zero holdings in a field EFI sells into. Keep filing means the strongest relative position, worth sustaining. Expand means a solid base worth extending outward. Grow selectively means niche value, worth filing where EFI is differentiated. Hold and defend means a dense field where the existing families are what matter. New filings run US, EP and CN first with a PCT on each, and key families extend to China, Japan and Korea where the products sell.
Where the field files, and where you do
Office
The fieldrecords since 2015
EFI
Japan
6,406
United States
5,188
439
China
1,618
59
Europe (EPO)
1,156
278
WIPO (PCT)
1,131
273
Korea
328
Australia
158
Germany
72
A mirror image. The field files Japan and China first, EFI files the US and Europe first. Blank cells are counts the export does not carry on the same basis.
The 2 places to file first
Industrial and packaging printing
Single pass corrugated and packaging architectures, ceramic and building material decoration, and the workflow that drives them. Nozomi, Cretaprint and VUTEk already ship here.
114of 27,095 in field
Connected and intelligent print workflow
Workflow automation, production analytics, predictive service and cloud connected printer intelligence, built on the Fiery front end and its lapsed families.
610records, 92% dead
07
Value erosion
Your most cited invention is dead. So is the family behind it.
The 2 inventions other companies copy most are both ones EFI stopped paying for. Anyone can use them today at no cost. Some can still be refiled, and that window closes.
Citations on the single most cited record
What a foundation looks like in a patent register.
189
What using either one costs a competitor today
$0
US 6,748,471Requesting and receiving a print job via a printer polling device128 citations · expired+
US 6,859,832Remote printing services over a network129 citations · expired+
The renewal record fails the same way
156 patents died from unpaid fees.
156unpaid lapses
08
Unprotected areas
These are areas where the product runs ahead of your patents.
EFI IQ, predictive service, closed-loop inspection and the digital thread are all shipping. We read the independent claims of granted patents to check, and none of them reach these features. The engineering exists. Only the filings are missing.
Apparent whitespace
EFI IQ cloud platform
No clear protection for EFI IQ style cloud architecture such as secure device onboarding, telemetry ingestion and normalisation, multi-tenant analytics pipelines, role-based alerting, and cloud-driven colour verification workflows.
What we read+
2 patents do claim this architecture. US 9,158,479 claims a data centre with per-device agents pushing and pulling device data, anonymised cross-customer benchmarking, and temperature and humidity sensing. US 9,417,829 claims a RIP hub that adds monitoring to printers that lack it. Neither is held by EFI today.
Apparent whitespace
Telemetry-driven uptime and predictive service
Production environments benefit heavily from minimising downtime, yet no clear coverage for predictive failure models for printheads, curing, transport modules and sensors, plus automated remediation sequencing and telemetry-triggered service dispatch.
What we read+
US 9,914,309 claims detecting a failed nozzle and shutting it off. Detection, not prediction. The only machine learning claim in the estate is US 12,491,726, confined to generating 3D relief on tiles.
Apparent whitespace
Closed-loop inspection to auto-correction
For corrugated, textiles and ceramics, inline inspection is commercially critical. No clear protection for defect signals tied to automatic density correction, registration correction, and self-optimising print modes triggered by substrate and environment signals.
What we read+
The front half is protected. US 12,208,613 claims a line-scan camera locating regions of interest and orienting the view for skew, zoom and rotation. US 9,914,309 claims substituting 1 pixel's colour value after a nozzle is shut off. Neither claim reaches back to machine control.
Apparent whitespace
Cross-platform digital thread
Differentiation increasingly comes from an integrated stack, but no clear protection for a unified job and process data model spanning job ticketing, substrate profiles, ink and curing settings, colour verification and production analytics, plus traceability across devices and plants.
What we read+
The workflow cluster runs to 63 records, of which 6 are live. US 9,417,829 claims message translation between a RIP and a printer, and nothing carries 1 model across Nozomi, Reggiani, Cretaprint, Fiery and IQ.
09
Savings
109 patents are costing you $368K a year.
We scored every granted patent, 1 by 1, on citations, term left and field density. 15 of them earn nothing and can go now, worth $56K a year, and 94 more need 1 review meeting to settle. The habit of keeping that list is what the book has been missing.
252
Kept on our call, 70% of the granted book
94
Need a human look, 26% of the granted book
$1.37M
The renewal budget today, modelled
$1.31M
The budget after the 15 lapse on purpose
15
records selected
$56.4K
renewal fees a year
$282K
over 5 years
Record
Title
Office
Age
Score10 is best
Renewal, per yearmodelled
Our call
The 15 sit in 5 EP, 4 US, 2 BR, and 1 each in JP, CN, ES and IN, at an average age of 13 years. Clearing the 94 review cases too would return about $312K more a year. The 15 prunes alone release enough to pay for 3 new filings a year at the flat rate. The score runs 5 checks out of 10: citation volume, citation recency, backward citation age, term remaining and field density. Patents under 10 years old keep automatically, 154 of the 361, and litigated or transferred ones stay regardless.
109 applications in examination. $730,300 back.
Separate from the granted book, 109 applications are still being examined right now. Finished where they sit, at $12,000 to $15,000 an application, they cost between $1.31M and $1.64M. Transferred to us they cost $741,200, at 1 fixed fee per application that runs until the case ends. The fee does not move when the examiner asks again, which is the part of the bill this portfolio has never been able to predict.
$1.47M
The 109 finished at Perkins Coie rates, midpoint
$741K
The same 109 at $6,800 flat
$730K
The difference across the 109
$6,700
Saved on every application transferred
109 applications, where they sit today
Perkins Coie charges anywhere between $12,000 and $15,000 an application.
$1,471,500$13,500 each, midpoint
The same 109 transferred to Photon
1 fee per application, per country, agreed before we open the file. Unlimited office action responses and examiner interviews, carried to allowance or final rejection, however long the examination runs.
$741,200$6,800 each
The difference, across the 109 pending applications
$730,300
30 new patents. $474,000 back.
Bought the way they are bought today, 30 new US patents cost $900,000. At 1 fixed fee per patent they cost $426,000, agreed before the work starts. Every office action, every examiner interview and the US lawyer fee sit inside it, so the bill does not move when the examination runs long.
$900K
30 new patents at the market rate
$426K
The same 30 at $14,200 flat
$474K
The difference across the 30
$15,800
Saved on every patent filed
30 new patents, the way they are bought today
A separate bill at each step, and a fresh one for every office action, at the market rate for a US filing carried through to grant.
$900,000$30,000 each
30 new patents at 1 fixed fee
Invention mining, search, drafting, filing, unlimited office actions and interviews, carried to allowance. Money back if the patent is rejected.
$426,000$14,200 each
The difference, across 30 filings
$474,000
$30,000 is the market rate for a US patent taken from filing through to grant. The flat fee is the rate quoted at the end of this report, and it does not change with the number of office actions.
10
Trademarks
6 places the EFI name works for someone else.
452 of EFI’s 591 trademarks no longer protect anything, a worse ratio than the patent side. 13 names still on sale lost their US registrations, and 2 flagship lines were never filed at all. Filings recover all of it, and the register needs the owner the renewal dates need.
Every mark, by status
Status
Share of all 591 marks, largest first015%30%45%60%
Marks
Share
Ended, cancelled or abandoned
275
46.5%
Expired at a renewal
177
29.9%
Registered and live
135
22.8%
Pending applications
4
0.7%
The names that got away
Names still on sale, no longer registered in the US
EFI Global, European Forest Institute, Equitable Food Initiative, Wentworth Mold and AM Conservation Group, across classes EFI trades in. 2 more sit on the Indian register.
5
Flagship lines never filed anywhere
Reggiani textile and AutoCal calibration. In first to file markets the name belongs to whoever files it, and nobody has.
2
The house mark in India is stuck in an address loop
The Class 9 word mark drew 4 same day change of address requests and a registry scrutiny report with no recorded response, so the renewal certificate may carry the wrong address.
4address requests
Holder
Where
Register reference
Classes
What the register shows
Environment Friendly Innovations Pvt Ltd
India
Registration 4795672
9
An unrelated company registered in Class 9, the class EFI most needs for its devices
Efi Foundation
India
Application 6472537
9, 16, 35, 42
A pending application across 4 classes that overlap EFI’s goods, services and publishing
EFI Global, Inc.
US
Registration 78186335
42, 45
A registered EFI mark in the services classes, held by an unrelated company
EFI Global, Inc.
US
Serial 89001746
42, 45
A further filing by the same holder, extending its claim in services
Cunningham Lindsey
International
IR 1262797
40, 42, 45
An EFI Global international registration across multiple designations
Resale listings
Online
arrow-digital.com, IndiaMART
Listings market EFI product with no apparent authorised association
Recommendation: 13 filings that close the gaps
Mark
Why it matters
Classes
Where
EFI
The house mark, missing in core classes and in markets where others hold the letters
7, 16, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42
US, EP, CN, JP, IN
Electronics For Imaging
The full company name, unregistered in most jurisdictions and classes
7, 16, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42
US, EP, CN
Reggiani
Active textile line with no trademark anywhere
7, 37, 42
US, EP, IT, CN
Nozomi
Single pass packaging press line; the machine name is unprotected
7, 40, 42
US, EP, CN
Cretaprint
Ceramic decoration systems, across the ceramic markets
7, 37, 42
US, EP, ES, CN
FabriVU
Textile product name in use and unprotected
7, 9, 42
US, EP
AutoCal
Calibration program with no filing anywhere in the world
9, 42
US, EP
EFI Cubik
Product line needing its own protection
7, 9
US, EP
Vutek
Wide format platform brand, coverage to extend
7, 9, 42
US, EP, CN
Jetrion
Industrial inkjet line, filed under a separate owner name
2, 7, 9
US, EP
EFI Connect
Customer event and platform name
35, 41, 42
US, EP
PROGRAPHICS
Product name in use, in the goods classes
9, 16
US
EFInsight
Analytics offering, the software and services name
9, 42
US, EP
Today the register lives mainly in Classes 9 and 42, while the machine, service and publishing classes (7, 16, 35, 37, 38, 41) sit unfiled in most places. The class columns above close that. The order of work runs the same way the priorities do. The 13 lapsed names revive or refile before any enforcement leans on them, these filings follow, led by the house mark, the India response closes next, and watches, oppositions and notices go to the third party holders.
11
How we can help
We’re replacing the black box with clarity of cost & certainty of outcome.
Clarity of cost
01
1 fixed fee, not 8 invoices
Every step is a separate bill today, and every office action is a fresh one. About $28,000 across 8 invoices over 3 years.
1 fee covering all 5 steps
Invention mining included
Every office action and interview included
Money back if it’s rejected
02
1 place, not 5 spreadsheets
Each firm sends its own list. Nobody’s job is the merge.
Pulse holds every asset, jurisdiction and deadline
Each one mapped to the product it covers
Certainty of outcome
03
Patent grant, or your money back
We only file what we expect to win. 97% of what we file is granted, against about 55% across the industry.
04
Granted in 11 months, not 30
The gap is rounds of examination, and in an hourly model every round is another bill.
How we deliver both
05
We save your money by saying no
Pulse scores every disclosure before an attorney sees it. Only the ideas with a real shot go forward.
We say no in week 1, not month 18
We would rather lose a filing fee than pay a refund
06
Attorneys who know your industry
Semiconductors get attorneys with 10 years in semiconductors. AI gets people who can argue model architecture to an examiner.
07
We read the examiner’s record first
1 person reads your patent. Some grant almost everything, some almost nothing. Their record is public, so we read it first.
08
Your inventor in the interview
Most firms send a lawyer to argue for the inventor. We bring the person who built it.
How we work
09
We’re proactive, not reactive
We don’t wait for you to send an invention.
An update every week
A hackathon with your engineers every 2nd week
A portfolio review every quarter
10
We only win if you win
We are paid when the patent is granted. If the patent is refused, you get your money back.
11
We’re incentivized to move faster
Hourly billing pays for time. A fixed fee pays for the grant.
12
Your investment
1 fixed fee per patent. Money back if it’s rejected.
What the patents cost
New patent in the US
Invention mining with your inventors and engineers
Patent search
Patent drafting
Filing a provisional or non provisional, or both
Unlimited office action responses
Unlimited examiner interviews
Carried through to allowance, US lawyer fee included
Money back if the patent is rejected in the US or India
$14,200flat, all in
Pending patent transfer
1 fee that runs until the case ends, however long it takes
Unlimited office actions until allowed or rejected
$6,800per patent, per country
Filing in another country
Built for EFI’s US, Europe and China footprint
Unlimited office actions
Carried through to grant or final rejection
Foreign lawyer fee included
$7,800per patent, per country
Renewals and upkeep
Keep, prune or accelerate guidance on every renewal
Every renewal date has a named owner
Covers the full 470 record live base
$230per year, per patent
Photon Pulse
Engineers submit ideas and get an instant AI score
In house counsel manages every patent and idea in 1 place
Fee waivedfor the term of the engagement
What the trademarks cost
The whole register, 1 monthly fee
The entire existing trademark portfolio maintained and renewed worldwide
Office actions drafted and answered in every country, with unlimited examination reports
Foreign trademark lawyers coordinated for you, worldwide
10 new trademark searches and 10 new marks filed each month, in any country
$7,300per month, all marks
Global Trademark Watch, powered by AI
Runs across the entire portfolio
Potentially conflicting marks identified and reported to you
Up to 5 new oppositions filed each month, incoming or outgoing, based on the watch
Up to 3 legal notices drafted and sent each month, worldwide
Includedservice in the monthly fee
Unlimited
Office action responses, every country
10
New searches a month, any country
10
New marks filed a month, any country
5
Oppositions a month, incoming or outgoing, up to
3
Legal notices a month, worldwide, up to
AI
Watch across the register
All out-of-pocket expenses, including foreign lawyer fees and government fees, are billed separately at actuals.
13
The pilot
The pilot started 8 June. Here is the record so far.
An invention harvesting workshop with R&D and service engineering surfaced 10 invention ideas. Each idea was scored on novelty, patentability and market potential using AI analysis. EFI’s IP committee reviewed all 10 scored ideas, selected 3 for filing and parked 7 for later cycles. Every date below was committed in writing before the work started.
Drafting pilot, 3 applications
#
Application
Committed by
Draft shared
Filing status
1
Optical Barrier for Crash Detection with Improved Alignment
25 Jun 2026
25 Jun 2026
Filed, US 19/749,878, 22 Jul 2026, Track One
2
Double-Sided Print Registration Using Reused Redirect Roller Creating a Sensor Gap
3 Jul 2026
3 Jul 2026
Filed, US 19/754,422, 27 Jul 2026, Track One
3
Multi-Sensor Predictive Maintenance Engine
22 Jul 2026
22 Jul 2026
EFI returned minor comments 5 Aug. Draft in final revision, ready for filing this week
3 of 3 drafts reached EFI on the committed date. The 7 parked ideas keep their scores and carry into the next cycle.
Prosecution pilot, 3 matters
Matter
Committed by
Official deadline
Status
US 18/670,465 Robot-assisted direct-to-garment printing
Interview agenda by 15 Jul
7 Aug 2026
Agenda shared with Marco 14 Jul, examiner interview 21 Jul, response filed 27 Jul, 11 days ahead of deadline
EP 25207009.9 Water-based inkjet printing, multiple layers and primer
Response by 30 Jun
15 Oct 2026
Response shared 30 Jun, 3.5 months ahead of deadline, approved by EFI 21 Jul. The previous European attorney had filed on 25 Jun before the power of attorney transfer completed 1 Jul, so EFI was covered on both sides of the transition
US 30/033163 Design application, added at EFI’s request
Response by 30 Aug
29 Sep 2026
Photon is obtaining the case files from the attorney of record, response committed a month ahead of the official deadline
DeliveredIn progress, date committed
0 deadlines missed. Every commitment in the pilot was dated in writing before the work started. Open item with EFI: approval of draft 3.
Happy to work as a vendor Partner. And bring clarity & certainty to your IP.
We are an AI native IP firm working with the likes of Automation Anywhere, Harness, 6sense and a number of Fortune 500 companies. We help them bring clarity of cost and certainty of outcome to their IP.