IP portfolio audit EFIPhoton Legal
Photon Legal Electronics For Imaging
FILE PL-IP-2026-0219   CONFIDENTIAL   ISSUED 2 AUGUST 2026
BASIS PUBLISHED PATENT RECORD   PREPARED FOR OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

IP portfolio audit

You can save $842K in a year.
$2.31M over 5 years.

We went through all 1,636 patents EFI has filed, and the 470 still live today. You grant faster than the whole European field, and your most cited invention appears in 1,743 later patents.

Almost everything this portfolio loses, it loses after the patent is already won. 109 of the patents you renew are no longer earning their fees, and the open ground under your presses is worth more again.

What we looked at

1,636
Patents examined
591
Trademarks examined
6
Companies benchmarked
15
Technology fields mapped

Contents

01
Your portfolio

1,636 filed. 470 still alive.

1,166 patents are gone out of the 1,636 ever filed. 811 simply reached the end of their 20 year life, which is normal. The other 309 were dropped early without paying renewal fees.

Every patent, by status

Status
Share of all 1,636 patents, largest first015%30%45%60%
Patents
Share
Inactive, expired at end of term
811
49.6%
Active, granted
361
22.1%
Inactive, fees not paid
156
9.5%
Inactive, withdrawn or surrendered
153
9.4%
Active, applied
109
6.7%
Inactive, status not stated in the extract
46
2.8%

Patents filed and granted, 2017 to 2025

015304560
Year
201720182019202020212022202320242025
Filed
58931282926433737
Granted
242044303739273039
Applications filedPatents granted

A patent stays alive only while a yearly fee is paid, which is what a renewal date is.

02
Strengths

4 things are working well.

You are good at getting patents. Grants come faster than the European field, the field builds on EFI inventions, and almost nobody has challenged what you hold. Everything after this is about keeping what the engine builds.

Strength, strongest first
Score, 10 is best
Foundational influence
1,743 citations on your top patent
Your most cited patent, and a family of virtual printer inventions cited hundreds of times each. These are the reference points rivals keep returning to.
8
Fast to grant
31 months to a US grant
Ahead of Durst at 43, AGFA at 39 and Bobst at 38, and within reach of Epson at 29. Protection starts while the European field is still in line.
7
Filing Focus
1,636 patents, all in print
The front end, inkjet engines, inks and industrial print.
7
Global Filings
439 US, 278 EP, 273 PCT
Filed where the customers are, plus Australia, Germany, China and Japan. The book is global rather than domestic, which matters for a company shipping machines worldwide.
6
03
Opportunities

6 places value is waiting.

The largest sits under your own machines. Nozomi, Reggiani and Cretaprint sell into fields where EFI holds 14, 42 and 100 patents. You already own the engineering, and only the filings are missing.

Where value waits
Score, 10 is best
Few Patents on Packaging are unprotected
8,136 to 18,959 patents per field
Nozomi, Reggiani and Cretaprint ship into packaging, textile and ceramic, where EFI holds 14, 42 and 100. A freedom to operate screen before new tooling beats a redesign after it.
5
The dead 1,166
71% of the book inactive
811 expired, 156 dropped for unpaid fees, 153 withdrawn, and no note explains which were chosen. Sorting them shows what is still in window to revive.
4
The crown jewels
2 dead families to revive
The most cited patent and the virtual printer family behind distributed printing. Refilings and continuations on what is still in window put claims back on that ground.
4
The brand register
13 names to take back
3 quarters of the trademark register is gone, the same silent way. Section 09 sets out the revivals, the 2 unfiled flagships and the filing order.
4
Scattered Ownership
54 names on the register
A systematic misspelling of the house name, and separate entries for BEST, Reggiani, Jetrion, TR Systems and Matan. Recordals are a clerical fix, not a loss of rights.
5
The pipeline
37 new filings in 2024
Filings run in the 30s while expiries mount every year. Grants have kept pace for years, so what has slowed is the supply of new ideas.
5
04
Competitive landscape

A focused specialist
among imaging giants.

FujiFilm holds 351,038 patents and Epson 265,964, but those books span cameras, sensors and consumer electronics. Inside the 10 classes that define digital printing, you out-file Durst and Bobst in all 10 and grant faster than the European 3. The exposure is Japan and China, the 2 fortress markets.

How big each book is

Company  Patent records0 to 351,038, largest first The book spans 
FujiFilm351,038Broad imaging conglomerate
Epson265,964Broad imaging conglomerate
AGFA48,162Imaging and print
Bobst6,579Packaging and converting
EFI1,636Digital print, the whole book
Durst877Industrial inkjet

Rival totals cover each company’s whole business, so this table sizes the neighbourhood. The class table below compares like with like.

The 10 classes that define digital printing

Class  What it covers, in plain words  EFIrecords Durst  AGFA  Bobst  FujiFilm  Epson 
G06F3/12Sending digital output to a print unit208810039,7179,316
H04N1/60Colour correction and control186022203,8642,698
B41J11/00Handling sheet or web media14565323657293,758
B41J2/01Ink jet11233496159,47821,516
B41J2/21Multi colour printing10015198347713,282
G06K15/02Printing using printers797625542859
B41J29/38Drives, motors and controls7674416,2378,221
H04N1/46Colour picture communication66112803,4332,006
G06F3/043Input using acoustic waves650001356
H04N1/40Picture signal circuits57019522,7791,075

Office by office, inside the 10 printing classes

Office
Share of the 6 companies shown, sorted by EFI’s count025%50%75%100%
EFI
FujiFilm
Epson
AGFA
Bobst
Durst
Total
of the 6
US
232
4,472
8,547
346
23
19
13,639
EPO
155
1,363
1,863
345
24
19
3,769
WIPO
142
785
487
145
12
16
1,587
Australia
85
111
35
27
0
5
263
Spain
36
4
52
43
14
13
162
Japan
34
20,848
26,416
277
7
8
47,590
China
28
1,534
4,149
71
15
6
5,803
Germany
28
421
662
196
0
10
1,317
Brazil
23
1
63
24
0
6
117
Canada
17
45
46
25
0
3
136
Israel
17
1
0
2
2
1
23
New Zealand
11
0
15
0
0
0
26
Austria
9
93
248
10
0
11
371
UK
6
49
44
21
0
0
120
EFI FujiFilm Epson AGFA Bobst Durst

Epson and FujiFilm overlap the inkjet and workflow ground, so if any names deserve a standing watch, it is those 2.

Months to a US grant

Firm
Shorter is better, fastest first012243648
Months
Photon Legal
about 11
Epson
29
FujiFilm
30
EFI
31
Bobst
38
AGFA
39
Durst
43
05
Prosecution

406 office actions.
94 requests for continued examination.

A request for continued examination, an RCE, is a paid restart. The office closes a case, and the file is bought back open so the same examiner can look at the same invention once more. We read the examination record of all 254 US applications the file wrapper covers. They carry 406 office actions, 94 RCEs and 181 paid extensions. That is $1.67M of prosecution work, and $507K of it went into applications that produced nothing you still hold today.

$1.67M
The prosecution meter, modelled at flat rates
$507K
Spent on files that are gone, 30% of the meter
94
RCEs across 60 applications
18 months
Added to the wait by 1 RCE, median

What the prosecution cost

Office action responses
406 rejections answered, 290 of them first time and 116 after the office had closed the case once.
$1,421,000406 at $3,500
Requests for continued examination
94 RCEs across 60 applications. Ten applications carry 30 of them between them. One file was restarted 6 times.
$141,00094 at $1,500
Paid extensions
181 extensions of time across 112 applications, bought when a reply deadline arrived before the reply did.
$107,000181 at $590
The prosecution meter, across 254 applications
$1.67M

16 applications died because of no response.

Application  What it covered  Office actions  RCEs  Modelled cost  How it ended 
14/490,559LED curable inkjet inks with UV absorbers126$57,490Abandoned after failure to respond. No revival petition on file. No patent.
14/548,259Multi-layered textured printing104$45,130Granted as 11,007,791, after 2,372 days.
11/327,070Merging scan files into a colour workflow113$44,180Granted after 2,266 days, then expired for unpaid renewal fees.

These 3 files carry $146,800 between them. 1 produced no patent, and 1 more granted and then expired for unpaid renewal fees.

06
Patent landscape

The field is 135,000 patents.
You hold 1,500 of them.

You hold the most patents in the area where most of them have already died, and the fewest where the market is biggest. Industrial printing holds 38,162 records against your 156, and it is where the presses ship. That is the open ground, and the calls below say which parts to take.

Where the book is alive, by technology area

Area
Share of EFI’s records in that area, live against dead050%100%
Live
EFI total
The field
Digital Imaging and Print WorkflowThe Fiery ground: colour, raster, job management. Deepest position, and the most dead.
50
610
24,233
Substrate Handling and Quality ControlMedia handling, curing, calibration, inspection. Half the records still live.
187
379
31,572
Ink and Coating MaterialsFormulations and coatings, the chemistry under every press.
119
239
23,899
Industrial Printing ApplicationsPackaging, textile, surface decoration. The largest field, the thinnest holding.
96
156
38,162
Inkjet Print Engine and Fluid DeliveryDrop control and printhead maintenance. The healthiest area in the book.
78
116
17,071
Granted or pendingInactive

A record can sit in more than 1 sub domain, so the 15 fields below count to 1,663. The 5 areas cover 1,500 of the 1,636 filed.

What to do in each of the 15 technology fields

Sub domain  Area  Fieldrecords since 2015 EFI  Our call 
Color ManagementDigital Imaging7,047190Expand
Raster ProcessingDigital Imaging9,205246Keep filing
Job ManagementDigital Imaging3,271190Keep filing
Production WorkflowDigital Imaging7,51990Grow selectively
Drop ControlInkjet Print Engine8,16670Hold and defend
Printhead MaintenanceInkjet Print Engine9,87447Hold and defend
Media HandlingSubstrate Handling5,89881Grow selectively
Drying and CuringSubstrate Handling7,009168Keep filing
Calibration and RegistrationSubstrate Handling1,35573Keep filing
Inspection and CompensationSubstrate Handling8,42078Grow selectively
Ink FormulationsInk and Coating17,994146Hold and defend
Materials and CoatingsInk and Coating6,984128Grow selectively
Packaging PrintingIndustrial Printing8,13614File first
Textile PrintingIndustrial Printing12,53642File first
Surface DecorationIndustrial Printing18,959100Expand

File first means near zero holdings in a field EFI sells into. Keep filing means the strongest relative position, worth sustaining. Expand means a solid base worth extending outward. Grow selectively means niche value, worth filing where EFI is differentiated. Hold and defend means a dense field where the existing families are what matter. New filings run US, EP and CN first with a PCT on each, and key families extend to China, Japan and Korea where the products sell.

Where the field files, and where you do

Office  The fieldrecords since 2015 EFI 
Japan6,406
United States5,188439
China1,61859
Europe (EPO)1,156278
WIPO (PCT)1,131273
Korea328
Australia158
Germany72

A mirror image. The field files Japan and China first, EFI files the US and Europe first. Blank cells are counts the export does not carry on the same basis.

The 2 places to file first

Industrial and packaging printing
Single pass corrugated and packaging architectures, ceramic and building material decoration, and the workflow that drives them. Nozomi, Cretaprint and VUTEk already ship here.
114of 27,095 in field
Connected and intelligent print workflow
Workflow automation, production analytics, predictive service and cloud connected printer intelligence, built on the Fiery front end and its lapsed families.
610records, 92% dead
07
Value erosion

Your most cited invention is dead.
So is the family behind it.

The 2 inventions other companies copy most are both ones EFI stopped paying for. Anyone can use them today at no cost. Some can still be refiled, and that window closes.

Citations on the single most cited record
What a foundation looks like in a patent register.
189
What using either one costs a competitor today
$0
US 6,748,471Requesting and receiving a print job via a printer polling device128 citations · expired+
Hewlett-Packard 17 RAH Color Technologies 9 Sharp 6 Xerox 5 Brother 5 Genesys 5 EFI (self) 4 Alcatel-Lucent 3 IBM 3 Ricoh 3 Canon 2 Kodak 2 128
US 6,859,832Remote printing services over a network129 citations · expired+
Microsoft 12 Hewlett-Packard 12 Ricoh 11 Canon 4 EFI (self) 3 Xerox 3 Pharos Systems 3 Konica Minolta 2 Dai Nippon Printing 2 Kodak 2 AirPrint Networks 2 129
The renewal record fails the same way
156 patents died from unpaid fees.
156unpaid lapses
08
Unprotected areas

These are areas where the product
runs ahead of your patents.

EFI IQ, predictive service, closed-loop inspection and the digital thread are all shipping. We read the independent claims of granted patents to check, and none of them reach these features. The engineering exists. Only the filings are missing.

Apparent whitespace

EFI IQ cloud platform

No clear protection for EFI IQ style cloud architecture such as secure device onboarding, telemetry ingestion and normalisation, multi-tenant analytics pipelines, role-based alerting, and cloud-driven colour verification workflows.

What we read+

2 patents do claim this architecture. US 9,158,479 claims a data centre with per-device agents pushing and pulling device data, anonymised cross-customer benchmarking, and temperature and humidity sensing. US 9,417,829 claims a RIP hub that adds monitoring to printers that lack it. Neither is held by EFI today.

Apparent whitespace

Telemetry-driven uptime and predictive service

Production environments benefit heavily from minimising downtime, yet no clear coverage for predictive failure models for printheads, curing, transport modules and sensors, plus automated remediation sequencing and telemetry-triggered service dispatch.

What we read+

US 9,914,309 claims detecting a failed nozzle and shutting it off. Detection, not prediction. The only machine learning claim in the estate is US 12,491,726, confined to generating 3D relief on tiles.

Apparent whitespace

Closed-loop inspection to auto-correction

For corrugated, textiles and ceramics, inline inspection is commercially critical. No clear protection for defect signals tied to automatic density correction, registration correction, and self-optimising print modes triggered by substrate and environment signals.

What we read+

The front half is protected. US 12,208,613 claims a line-scan camera locating regions of interest and orienting the view for skew, zoom and rotation. US 9,914,309 claims substituting 1 pixel's colour value after a nozzle is shut off. Neither claim reaches back to machine control.

Apparent whitespace

Cross-platform digital thread

Differentiation increasingly comes from an integrated stack, but no clear protection for a unified job and process data model spanning job ticketing, substrate profiles, ink and curing settings, colour verification and production analytics, plus traceability across devices and plants.

What we read+

The workflow cluster runs to 63 records, of which 6 are live. US 9,417,829 claims message translation between a RIP and a printer, and nothing carries 1 model across Nozomi, Reggiani, Cretaprint, Fiery and IQ.

09
Savings

109 patents are costing you $368K a year.

We scored every granted patent, 1 by 1, on citations, term left and field density. 15 of them earn nothing and can go now, worth $56K a year, and 94 more need 1 review meeting to settle. The habit of keeping that list is what the book has been missing.

252
Kept on our call, 70% of the granted book
94
Need a human look, 26% of the granted book
$1.37M
The renewal budget today, modelled
$1.31M
The budget after the 15 lapse on purpose
15
records selected
$56.4K
renewal fees a year
$282K
over 5 years
RecordTitleOffice AgeScore10 is best Renewal, per yearmodelledOur call

The 15 sit in 5 EP, 4 US, 2 BR, and 1 each in JP, CN, ES and IN, at an average age of 13 years. Clearing the 94 review cases too would return about $312K more a year. The 15 prunes alone release enough to pay for 3 new filings a year at the flat rate. The score runs 5 checks out of 10: citation volume, citation recency, backward citation age, term remaining and field density. Patents under 10 years old keep automatically, 154 of the 361, and litigated or transferred ones stay regardless.

109 applications in examination. $730,300 back.

Separate from the granted book, 109 applications are still being examined right now. Finished where they sit, at $12,000 to $15,000 an application, they cost between $1.31M and $1.64M. Transferred to us they cost $741,200, at 1 fixed fee per application that runs until the case ends. The fee does not move when the examiner asks again, which is the part of the bill this portfolio has never been able to predict.

$1.47M
The 109 finished at Perkins Coie rates, midpoint
$741K
The same 109 at $6,800 flat
$730K
The difference across the 109
$6,700
Saved on every application transferred
109 applications, where they sit today
Perkins Coie charges anywhere between $12,000 and $15,000 an application.
$1,471,500$13,500 each, midpoint
The same 109 transferred to Photon
1 fee per application, per country, agreed before we open the file. Unlimited office action responses and examiner interviews, carried to allowance or final rejection, however long the examination runs.
$741,200$6,800 each
The difference, across the 109 pending applications
$730,300

30 new patents. $474,000 back.

Bought the way they are bought today, 30 new US patents cost $900,000. At 1 fixed fee per patent they cost $426,000, agreed before the work starts. Every office action, every examiner interview and the US lawyer fee sit inside it, so the bill does not move when the examination runs long.

$900K
30 new patents at the market rate
$426K
The same 30 at $14,200 flat
$474K
The difference across the 30
$15,800
Saved on every patent filed
30 new patents, the way they are bought today
A separate bill at each step, and a fresh one for every office action, at the market rate for a US filing carried through to grant.
$900,000$30,000 each
30 new patents at 1 fixed fee
Invention mining, search, drafting, filing, unlimited office actions and interviews, carried to allowance. Money back if the patent is rejected.
$426,000$14,200 each
The difference, across 30 filings
$474,000

$30,000 is the market rate for a US patent taken from filing through to grant. The flat fee is the rate quoted at the end of this report, and it does not change with the number of office actions.

10
Trademarks

6 places the EFI name
works for someone else.

452 of EFI’s 591 trademarks no longer protect anything, a worse ratio than the patent side. 13 names still on sale lost their US registrations, and 2 flagship lines were never filed at all. Filings recover all of it, and the register needs the owner the renewal dates need.

Every mark, by status

Status
Share of all 591 marks, largest first015%30%45%60%
Marks
Share
Ended, cancelled or abandoned
275
46.5%
Expired at a renewal
177
29.9%
Registered and live
135
22.8%
Pending applications
4
0.7%

The names that got away

Names still on sale, no longer registered in the US
UltraVu, Prograph, PressVu, OneFlow, MicroPress, Inkware, EDOX, EBEAM, DocStream, DocBuilder Pro, DocBuilder, BioVu and BioWare.
13
Companies holding the brands EFI in the US
EFI Global, European Forest Institute, Equitable Food Initiative, Wentworth Mold and AM Conservation Group, across classes EFI trades in. 2 more sit on the Indian register.
5
Flagship lines never filed anywhere
Reggiani textile and AutoCal calibration. In first to file markets the name belongs to whoever files it, and nobody has.
2
The house mark in India is stuck in an address loop
The Class 9 word mark drew 4 same day change of address requests and a registry scrutiny report with no recorded response, so the renewal certificate may carry the wrong address.
4address requests
Holder  Where  Register reference  Classes  What the register shows 
Environment Friendly Innovations Pvt LtdIndiaRegistration 47956729An unrelated company registered in Class 9, the class EFI most needs for its devices
Efi FoundationIndiaApplication 64725379, 16, 35, 42A pending application across 4 classes that overlap EFI’s goods, services and publishing
EFI Global, Inc.USRegistration 7818633542, 45A registered EFI mark in the services classes, held by an unrelated company
EFI Global, Inc.USSerial 8900174642, 45A further filing by the same holder, extending its claim in services
Cunningham LindseyInternationalIR 126279740, 42, 45An EFI Global international registration across multiple designations
Resale listingsOnlinearrow-digital.com, IndiaMART Listings market EFI product with no apparent authorised association

Recommendation: 13 filings that close the gaps

Mark  Why it matters  Classes  Where 
EFIThe house mark, missing in core classes and in markets where others hold the letters7, 16, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42US, EP, CN, JP, IN
Electronics For ImagingThe full company name, unregistered in most jurisdictions and classes7, 16, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42US, EP, CN
ReggianiActive textile line with no trademark anywhere7, 37, 42US, EP, IT, CN
NozomiSingle pass packaging press line; the machine name is unprotected7, 40, 42US, EP, CN
CretaprintCeramic decoration systems, across the ceramic markets7, 37, 42US, EP, ES, CN
FabriVUTextile product name in use and unprotected7, 9, 42US, EP
AutoCalCalibration program with no filing anywhere in the world9, 42US, EP
EFI CubikProduct line needing its own protection7, 9US, EP
VutekWide format platform brand, coverage to extend7, 9, 42US, EP, CN
JetrionIndustrial inkjet line, filed under a separate owner name2, 7, 9US, EP
EFI ConnectCustomer event and platform name35, 41, 42US, EP
PROGRAPHICSProduct name in use, in the goods classes9, 16US
EFInsightAnalytics offering, the software and services name9, 42US, EP

Today the register lives mainly in Classes 9 and 42, while the machine, service and publishing classes (7, 16, 35, 37, 38, 41) sit unfiled in most places. The class columns above close that. The order of work runs the same way the priorities do. The 13 lapsed names revive or refile before any enforcement leans on them, these filings follow, led by the house mark, the India response closes next, and watches, oppositions and notices go to the third party holders.

11
How we can help

We’re replacing the black box with
clarity of cost & certainty of outcome.

Clarity of cost

01

1 fixed fee, not 8 invoices

Every step is a separate bill today, and every office action is a fresh one. About $28,000 across 8 invoices over 3 years.

  • 1 fee covering all 5 steps
  • Invention mining included
  • Every office action and interview included
  • Money back if it’s rejected

02

1 place, not 5 spreadsheets

Each firm sends its own list. Nobody’s job is the merge.

  • Pulse holds every asset, jurisdiction and deadline
  • Each one mapped to the product it covers

Certainty of outcome

03

Patent grant, or your money back

We only file what we expect to win. 97% of what we file is granted, against about 55% across the industry.

04

Granted in 11 months, not 30

The gap is rounds of examination, and in an hourly model every round is another bill.

How we deliver both

05

We save your money by saying no

Pulse scores every disclosure before an attorney sees it. Only the ideas with a real shot go forward.

  • We say no in week 1, not month 18
  • We would rather lose a filing fee than pay a refund

06

Attorneys who know your industry

Semiconductors get attorneys with 10 years in semiconductors. AI gets people who can argue model architecture to an examiner.

07

We read the examiner’s record first

1 person reads your patent. Some grant almost everything, some almost nothing. Their record is public, so we read it first.

08

Your inventor in the interview

Most firms send a lawyer to argue for the inventor. We bring the person who built it.

How we work

09

We’re proactive, not reactive

We don’t wait for you to send an invention.

  • An update every week
  • A hackathon with your engineers every 2nd week
  • A portfolio review every quarter

10

We only win if you win

We are paid when the patent is granted. If the patent is refused, you get your money back.

11

We’re incentivized to move faster

Hourly billing pays for time. A fixed fee pays for the grant.

12
Your investment

1 fixed fee per patent.
Money back if it’s rejected.

What the patents cost

New patent in the US
  • Invention mining with your inventors and engineers
  • Patent search
  • Patent drafting
  • Filing a provisional or non provisional, or both
  • Unlimited office action responses
  • Unlimited examiner interviews
  • Carried through to allowance, US lawyer fee included
  • Money back if the patent is rejected in the US or India
$14,200flat, all in
Pending patent transfer
  • 1 fee that runs until the case ends, however long it takes
  • Unlimited office actions until allowed or rejected
$6,800per patent, per country
Filing in another country
  • Built for EFI’s US, Europe and China footprint
  • Unlimited office actions
  • Carried through to grant or final rejection
  • Foreign lawyer fee included
$7,800per patent, per country
Renewals and upkeep
  • Keep, prune or accelerate guidance on every renewal
  • Every renewal date has a named owner
  • Covers the full 470 record live base
$230per year, per patent
Photon Pulse
  • Engineers submit ideas and get an instant AI score
  • In house counsel manages every patent and idea in 1 place
Fee waivedfor the term of the engagement

What the trademarks cost

The whole register, 1 monthly fee
  • The entire existing trademark portfolio maintained and renewed worldwide
  • Office actions drafted and answered in every country, with unlimited examination reports
  • Foreign trademark lawyers coordinated for you, worldwide
  • 10 new trademark searches and 10 new marks filed each month, in any country
$7,300per month, all marks
Global Trademark Watch, powered by AI
  • Runs across the entire portfolio
  • Potentially conflicting marks identified and reported to you
  • Up to 5 new oppositions filed each month, incoming or outgoing, based on the watch
  • Up to 3 legal notices drafted and sent each month, worldwide
Includedservice in the monthly fee
Unlimited
Office action responses, every country
10
New searches a month, any country
10
New marks filed a month, any country
5
Oppositions a month, incoming or outgoing, up to
3
Legal notices a month, worldwide, up to
AI
Watch across the register

All out-of-pocket expenses, including foreign lawyer fees and government fees, are billed separately at actuals.

13
The pilot

The pilot started 8 June.
Here is the record so far.

An invention harvesting workshop with R&D and service engineering surfaced 10 invention ideas. Each idea was scored on novelty, patentability and market potential using AI analysis. EFI’s IP committee reviewed all 10 scored ideas, selected 3 for filing and parked 7 for later cycles. Every date below was committed in writing before the work started.

Drafting pilot, 3 applications

# Application Committed by Draft shared Filing status
1 Optical Barrier for Crash Detection with Improved Alignment 25 Jun 2026 25 Jun 2026 Filed, US 19/749,878, 22 Jul 2026, Track One
2 Double-Sided Print Registration Using Reused Redirect Roller Creating a Sensor Gap 3 Jul 2026 3 Jul 2026 Filed, US 19/754,422, 27 Jul 2026, Track One
3 Multi-Sensor Predictive Maintenance Engine 22 Jul 2026 22 Jul 2026 EFI returned minor comments 5 Aug. Draft in final revision, ready for filing this week

3 of 3 drafts reached EFI on the committed date. The 7 parked ideas keep their scores and carry into the next cycle.

Prosecution pilot, 3 matters

Matter Committed by Official deadline Status
US 18/670,465
Robot-assisted direct-to-garment printing
Interview agenda by 15 Jul 7 Aug 2026 Agenda shared with Marco 14 Jul, examiner interview 21 Jul, response filed 27 Jul, 11 days ahead of deadline
EP 25207009.9
Water-based inkjet printing, multiple layers and primer
Response by 30 Jun 15 Oct 2026 Response shared 30 Jun, 3.5 months ahead of deadline, approved by EFI 21 Jul. The previous European attorney had filed on 25 Jun before the power of attorney transfer completed 1 Jul, so EFI was covered on both sides of the transition
US 30/033163
Design application, added at EFI’s request
Response by 30 Aug 29 Sep 2026 Photon is obtaining the case files from the attorney of record, response committed a month ahead of the official deadline
Delivered In progress, date committed

0 deadlines missed. Every commitment in the pilot was dated in writing before the work started. Open item with EFI: approval of draft 3.

Happy to work as a vendor Partner.
And bring clarity & certainty to your IP.

Amit Koshal
Amit Koshal
Founder, Photon Legal
We are an AI native IP firm working with the likes of Automation Anywhere, Harness, 6sense and a number of Fortune 500 companies. We help them bring clarity of cost and certainty of outcome to their IP.

Set up a call with Amit Koshalamit@photonlegal.com